The IEP can look finished and still need clearer details.
The placement page and support continuum can look official while still leaving out the details a parent needs to understand what the school is promising, refusing, or measuring.
The free audit checks the language in the actual IEP against the student's documented needs so you can focus on the pages and questions that matter most.
Start with the situation you are actually in.
This page is for moments when the school proposes a placement change, the current setting is not working, or you need to understand if supports were considered first.
This page is for preparing clearer school questions, not for deciding legal claims. The strongest next step is usually a specific written request tied to the IEP page and the data behind it.
The audit can review the IEP pages you include.
It does not stop at one concern or a short checklist. When the relevant pages are included, the audit reviews major IEP sections for unclear language, missing context, documentation gaps, and issues that may deserve a written question.
Evaluations and Present Levels
Check that the IEP describes the student's needs, strengths, baseline data, and current performance.
Goals and Progress Monitoring
Confirm goals are measurable, tied to documented needs, and supported by clear progress-reporting methods.
Services and Accommodations
Look for supports that are individualized, specific enough to follow, and clear about provider, frequency, duration, and setting.
Placement and Access
Review how the plan addresses classroom access, least restrictive environment, behavior, communication, and related-service needs.
Parent Concerns and Team Decisions
Make sure parent input, school refusals, Prior Written Notice, and important meeting decisions are documented clearly.
Procedure Questions to Verify
Identify notice, timeline, refusal, or vague-commitment questions that may need local verification before a parent relies on them.
What this review pays attention to
Along with the included IEP pages above, the audit pays special attention to these issues that may be relevant to this concern. These are examples of extra scrutiny, not the limits of the review.
Check if placement is based on the IEP and student data.
Supports tried before moving to a more restrictive setting.
How much time is outside general education and why.
Make sure pWN explains a proposed or refused placement change.
A useful result points to a record, not a panic spiral.
This is the kind of parent-facing output the page is built around: a specific IEP section, the reason it deserves review, and one calm next step before any broader escalation.
Finding
Placement change lacks support data
Evidence to check
The school proposes a separate setting, but the record does not show which supplementary aids and services were tried first.
Parent-safe next step
Request in writing that the team document supports considered, data relied on, and PWN if a request is refused.
Upload only the records needed for this concern.
You do not need a perfect binder or every school record. Start with the current IEP pages tied to the issue, then add only the few records that explain the concern most clearly.
Placement page and service grid
Upload the IEP sections naming setting, service location, time outside general education, and related supports.
Progress and behavior data
Add data showing if the current placement supports access, progress, or safety.
Records of supports tried
Include accommodations, supplementary aids, FBA/BIP, staff support, or meeting notes.
First written request
"Please show the data and IEP supports the team considered before proposing or refusing this placement decision."
Ask one question the team can answer.
"What supports would need to be in place for the student to make progress in the least restrictive appropriate setting?"
Get clearer questions from your actual IEP.
You do not need to compare every page to a checklist. Upload the relevant pages and let the audit help organize sections that may need clarification, weak language, or possible next questions.
Review the IEP FirstWhat you get from the audit
The result is a prioritized review of the document, not another generic article.
Organize the meeting record
The audit helps parents pull the draft pages, notices, data, and unresolved requests most likely to matter in the room.
Focus the agenda
It identifies the question that should be answered before the meeting moves on.
Leave with the next step in writing
Parents can use the result to ask what will be revised, refused, or documented after the meeting.
Check if the placement page and support continuum is specific enough for a parent to understand and the team to implement.
Which IEP page, evaluation, progress report, service log, or school notice should be checked first.
Which missing detail should become the first written question.
Which legal, deadline, consent, or state-specific issue should be verified before relying on the page.
How the free audit works
Upload the IEP you want checked
Use the current document from the school. You do not need to highlight it, organize it, or know which section is wrong first.
The audit reviews the pages you upload
When those pages are included, it reviews goals, services, accommodations, progress monitoring, parent concerns, and procedure questions for unclear language or missing context.
Get prioritized findings
See which sections may need review first, which page to ask about, and what to raise with the school.
Reasons parents run this audit
If any of these sound familiar, the written IEP deserves a closer look.
Placement is discussed before goals, services, and supports.
Ask what IEP supports were considered and tried.
The team cites program availability instead of student need.
Ask what data shows this placement is appropriate.
The placement page is vague about service location.
Ask where services will happen and how much time is outside general education.
You do not have to sort through the IEP by yourself.
Start with the concern. When you want document-specific help, upload only the relevant IEP pages and the few records that explain the issue.
Review the IEP First